• Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Youtube
  • Johannesburg (Head Office) 011 467 0810
  • George – 044 873 2782
  • Tax Rates
  • Careers
Tax Consulting South Africa
  • ABOUT
    • Resources
      • Lexis Nexis Expatriate Tax Textbook 2nd Edition
      • Tax Case Law Wrap-Up
      • FAQ’s
        • Tax Return – Frequently Asked Questions
        • General Questions on Financial Emigration
        • General Expat Tax Questions
        • Expat Tax Frequently Asked Questions
        • General Questions on Double Tax Agreements
        • General VDP Questions
      • Company Profiles
        • All Units Company Profile
        • Tax Consulting Company Profile
        • Financial Emigration Company Profile
        • Tax Legal Company Profile
        • Xpatweb Company Profile
        • Africorp Accounting Company Profile
        • TCSAS Company Profile
      • SARS Important Links
        • SARS Ordinarily Resident Test
        • SARS Physical Presence Test
        • SARS Interpretation Note No. 34 (issue 2)
        • SARS Common Reporting Standard
  • SERVICES
    • Tax Legal Assistance
      • Tax Debts
        • Outstanding Returns
        • When SARS Unlawfully Help Themselves To Your Bank Balance
        • Tax Debts Solutions
      • VAT Advisory
        • VAT Advisory – General
        • VAT Advisory – Exports
        • Vat Advisory – Cross Border
      • International Tax Advisory and Structuring
      • Employment Tax
      • Tax Dispute Resolution (ADR)
      • Advance Tax Rulings
      • Commercial Transactions
      • Cross Border Taxation
      • Due Diligence – Mergers and Acquisitions
      • SARS Audit
      • Trusts
      • VAT Refunds
      • Tax Refunds
      • Voluntary Disclosures to SARS
      • CIPC’s Beneficial Ownership
    • Accounting Services
      • Hassle-Free And Convenient Customs And Excise Duties
      • Independent Audit
      • Independent Review
      • Customs Registration
    • Deceased Estates Administration
    • Expatriate Tax Services
      • Non-Resident Confirmation Letter
      • Expat Tax Calculation Service
      • Financial Emigration
      • Double Taxation Agreements Relief
      • DTA Tax Services
      • Expatriate Tax Services for Employers
      • US Tax Services
    • Remuneration Structuring
      • Package Structuring Tool with Flexible Benefits
      • Cost To Company Conversion Flexible Benefits
      • Tax and Cost to Company Training
      • Payroll Audits and Reviews
    • Trust Tax Services
    • Individual Tax Return Services
    • Company Set-Up
      • Foreign Company Registration in South Africa
      • Expanding your Global Footprint in Africa
      • Local Companies Looking To Expand Operations Offshore
      • Corporate Banking and Forex
      • Local Company Set Up Services
      • CIPC Company Compliance & Secretarial Services
      • CIPC Company Reinstatement
    • SARB
    • Approval For International Transfers AIT Process
    • Mandatory Disclosure for the Wealthy
  • EVENTS
  • NEWS
    • Latest Podcasts
  • CONTACT US
    • Communities
  • 2025 BUDGET SPEECH
  • Search
  • Menu Menu
LEARN MORE DOWNLOAD 2024 BUDGET SPEECH TAX HIGHLIGHTS

GENERAL COMMENTARY ON THE BUDGET SPEECH 2024

Finance Minister, Enoch Godongwana, presented a ‘limp’ budget today in respect of the forthcoming 2024/25 tax year, seeking to maintain government expenditure, notwithstanding revenue collection shortfalls. Amidst a decline in the mining tax revenue windfalls experienced over the last two years, the Minister has sought to collect the default from the already strained individual taxpayer, as well as dipping into the Gold and Foreign Exchange Contingency Reserve Account (“GFECRA”).

Veering from past trends, the Minister did not announce the customary inflationary adjustments to personal income tax tables nor to medical tax credits. The result is a tax base with less buying power, but the same tax bill. Fortunately, there is no increase to fuel levies, value-added tax, and income taxes.

In the absence of healthy revenue figures, government intends to allocate R150 billion from the GFECRA, towards foreign debt service costs, which has some economists and opposition members questioning whether government is not merely borrowing from the future to pay the now. Irrespective, the disconcerting truth of this budget is that there are no new sustainable streams of revenue collection identifiable for the immediate tax years ahead.

In previous budget speeches, government had indicated a tax focus on expatriates working abroad and the wealthy who maintained ties to South Africa. For several years, expatriates have faced the brunt of law changes aimed at limiting existing tax exemptions and which have driven thousands of taxpayers to formally cut ties with South Africa. It is perhaps then no surprise that the government sought fit not to introduce further policies of this nature in this budget.

Wealthy South Africans have also been spared by government in this budget, despite previous indications that a possible wealth tax was being explored. More recently, SARS established the High Wealth Individuals unit and introduced a change to the income tax return affecting taxpayers with asset holdings in excess of R50 million, which also gave credence to the view that wealthy taxpayers were being eyed for additional revenue collection.

The tax strategy described in the budget review is consistent with the message expressed by the SARS Commissioner throughout his tenure, namely that government’s focus is on broadening the tax base, improving tax compliance and making the tax administrative system more efficient. Tax policies for the upcoming tax years include a 150% deduction for investments by producers into production capacity for electric and hydrogen-powered vehicles, effective 1 March 2026. This incentive follows the prior year’s introduction of a 125% tax deduction for corporates who invest in renewables, thereby demonstrating that government remains eager to grow different avenues in the renewables sector.

On the expenditure side of the equation, certain areas of concern to be noted are the projected expenditure on the social wage, which has increased by 9% to exceed 60% of the consolidated government non-interest spend over three years. In real monetary terms, this equates to more than R387 billion, with no indication of slowing down, in keeping with the Minister’s approach of ‘don’t upset the apple cart’. The larger concern remains government’s debt service costs, increased to R382 billion and exceeding 20% of the tax revenue.

In the Minister’s speech, he made sure to announce that government had allocated R1.4 billion towards the National Health Insurance (“NHI”) scheme. This grant demonstrates the government’s commitment to laying the foundation for the eventual large-scale roll out of the NHI, following the adequate development of national health facilities and infrastructure. In contrast, the fight against corruption, which was a headliner item in last year’s budget, barely featured in this budget.

Almost a full year after South Africa’s grey listing by the Financial Action Task Force (“FATF”), National Treasury was pleased to report some progress on the implementation of its 22-item action plan. Without delving too deeply into the finer details, the silver lining is that 2 of these action items had been addressed as of October 2023. Government further expressed the importance of complying with the FATF’s action plan to lift the grey listed status and unlock increased foreign direct investment over the coming years.

Finally, other noteworthy amendments include marginal increases to the so-called “sin taxes” up to a maximum of 7.2% for alcohol products and 8.2% for tobacco products.

Darren Britz
Partner and Head of Tax Legal
(Admitted Attorney of the High Court of South Africa)

Richan Schwellnus
Tax Attorney
Admitted Attorney, BCom (Hons), LLB
General Tax Practitioner (SA)™ (SAIT)

DOWNLOAD 2024 BUDGET SPEECH HIGHLIGHTS DOCUMENT

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

BUDGET SPEECH PRESS ROOM

UPCOMING EVENTS

  • SAIPA BUDGET BREAKFAST 2022/2023

    SAIPA Budget Breakfast 2022/2023
  • #EXPATTAX2022 UPDATE

    #EXPATTAX2022
PreviousNext
12
VIEW ALL

IN THE MEDIA

PreviousNext
12

RELATED ARTICLES

PreviousNext
123
MORE NEWS
© Copyright 2025 Tax Consulting South Africa | Privacy Policy
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Youtube

Controlled Foreign Companies –
South African Tax Considerations

Controlled Foreign Companies – South African Tax Considerations

South Africa’s tax system includes a Controlled Foreign Company (CFC) regime designed to address the taxation of income earned by foreign companies owned by South African tax residents.  

Where a South African tax resident holds or controls a foreign company, they may be subject to income tax in South Africa on the CFC’s foreign income, even if that income has not yet been distributed. This is an anti-avoidance measure to prevent South African tax residents from utilising foreign companies in the avoidance of South African tax.

What is a Controlled Foreign Company?

A CFC is broadly defined in section 9D of the Income Tax Act, No. 58 of 1962, as any foreign company where more than 50% of the total participation rights or voting rights are directly or indirectly held or exercisable by one or more South African tax residents.

Where this threshold is met, and unless a specific exemption applies, the net income of the CFC must be included in the income of the South African resident(s) in proportion to their participation rights, and taxed accordingly.

Taxpayers who fail to accurately account for a CFC’s income risk audit or reassessment by SARS, especially in light of increased global transparency and data sharing through mechanisms such as the Common Reporting Standard.

Key Features of the CFC Regime

  • Deemed Income Inclusion: The net income of a CFC is deemed to accrue to South African resident shareholders.
  • High Tax Exemption: A CFC’s income may be exempt from inclusion if it is subject to tax in a foreign jurisdiction at a rate of at least 67,5% of the South African tax that would have been payable, had the CFC been a resident of South Africa.
  • Foreign Business Establishment (FBE) Exemption: Income earned through a “foreign business establishment” may be exempt where the CFC carries on substantial economic activity in its foreign jurisdiction. This is a factual enquiry and subject to rigorous scrutiny by SARS.
  • Passive Income Rules: Passive income (such as interest, royalties, rental, and certain capital gains) is more likely to be caught by the CFC rules, particularly where there is no meaningful economic substance abroad.
  • Anti-Avoidance and Transfer Pricing: The CFC rules operate alongside other anti-avoidance provisions, including transfer pricing rules and the general anti-avoidance rules, ensuring that offshore structures with little commercial rationale may still be taxed in South Africa.
×

Place of Effective Management and Corporate Tax Residency in South Africa

South Africa follows a residence-based system of taxation, meaning that resident companies are subject to tax on their worldwide income.

In terms of section 1 of the Income Tax Act, No. 58 of 1962 (the Act), a company is regarded as a South African tax resident if it is either:

  1. Incorporated, established or formed in South Africa; or
  2. Has its place of effective management (POEM) in South Africa,

unless a double tax agreement (DTA) provides otherwise.

The concept of POEM is central to determining a company’s tax residency, particularly where cross-border structures are involved. It affects both foreign companies with South African involvement and South African-incorporated entities that may be managed from abroad.

What is Place of Effective Management?

Although not defined in the Act, POEM has been interpreted through South African case law, SARS guidance, and international commentary, particularly the OECD Model Tax Convention and Commentary thereto.

Broadly, POEM refers to the location where key management and commercial decisions necessary for the conduct of the entity’s overall business are made, in substance and not merely in form.

The determination of POEM is a factual enquiry, and is not limited to formalities such as the registered office, place of incorporation, or location of board meetings. Instead, it focuses on:

  • Who exercises strategic control, and
  • Where such decisions are actually made and implemented.

Application in Cross-Border Contexts

POEM plays a critical role in determining corporate tax residency in both inbound and outbound scenarios:

  • Inbound structures: Foreign-incorporated companies may be deemed South African tax residents if their effective management is located in South Africa, which is often the case where South African shareholders or directors run the business.
  • Outbound structures: South African-incorporated companies may be treated as non-resident for tax purposes if their POEM is demonstrably situated offshore. However, this outcome requires real substance and consistent governance in the foreign jurisdiction.

Both scenarios must be carefully evaluated in light of South African domestic law and any applicable DTA.

Interaction with Double Tax Agreements

Where a company is regarded as resident in both South Africa and another jurisdiction, the relevant DTA will typically contain a tie-breaker clause to resolve the conflict.

Most of South Africa’s DTAs allocate tax residency to the country where the company’s POEM is located. However, some newer treaties apply a Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP), requiring the tax authorities of both states to determine residence based on additional factors.

Correct DTA application is essential to avoid dual residency exposure and to obtain treaty relief on dividends, interest, royalties, and other income.

Practical Implications for Companies

Incorrect or dual tax residency status can expose a company to:

  • Double taxation on the same income across two jurisdictions;
  • Withholding tax complications, including denied treaty relief on dividends, interest, and royalties;
  • Increased scrutiny by SARS, especially in outbound structures where POEM may be artificially shifted offshore; and
  • Transfer pricing risk where management functions are split across jurisdictions.
×

Permanent Establishment – Tax Exposure in Cross-Border Contexts

As businesses expand across borders, one of the key tax risks they face is the inadvertent creation of a permanent establishment (PE) in a foreign jurisdiction. A PE may trigger foreign income tax exposure for a company even in the absence of incorporation or tax residency in that jurisdiction.

South African companies with offshore activities, or foreign companies with South African operations, must be aware of the PE concept, how it arises, and how it interacts with applicable Double Tax Agreements (DTAs).

What Is a Permanent Establishment?

A PE is generally defined in a DTA as a fixed place of business through which the business of an enterprise is wholly or partly carried on. Common examples include:

  • A branch, office, factory, workshop, or place of management;
  • A building site or construction project lasting more than a specified period (often 6 to 12 months); or
  • The presence of a dependent agent who regularly concludes contracts on behalf of the foreign entity.

South Africa’s DTAs typically follow the OECD Model Tax Convention, and many incorporate updated provisions from the Multilateral Instrument (MLI), which narrows common avoidance strategies and expands the scope of PE risk.

Inbound vs Outbound Permanent Establishment Risk

  • Inbound PE risk: A foreign company may be taxed in South Africa if its activities in South Africa amount to a PE under the applicable DTA. This could occur where there is a fixed place of business, staff performing core functions, or a local agent concluding contracts on behalf of the foreign entity.
  • Outbound PE risk: A South African company operating abroad may face foreign tax exposure if it is deemed to have created a PE in the foreign jurisdiction, for example through a warehouse, a project office, or local contractors under its control.

Even short-term or project-based activities can give rise to PE risks if not carefully managed and monitored.

Consequences of a Permanent Establishment Finding

If a PE is found to exist:

  • The host country gains taxing rights over the profits attributable to that PE;
  • The company may be subject to corporate income tax, VAT registration, and payroll compliance obligations in the foreign jurisdiction; and
  • Transfer pricing scrutiny may be triggered, especially in relation to intra-group transactions and profit attribution methods.

Non-compliance can result in penalties, double taxation, and reputational harm.

In a connected world, even limited physical or digital presence in a foreign country can create tax exposure. Managing PE risk is essential for international tax compliance and operational efficiency.

×

Controlled Foreign Companies –
South African Tax Considerations

South Africa’s tax system includes a Controlled Foreign Company (CFC) regime designed to address the taxation of income earned by foreign companies owned by South African tax residents.  

Where a South African tax resident holds or controls a foreign company, they may be subject to income tax in South Africa on the CFC’s foreign income, even if that income has not yet been distributed. This is an anti-avoidance measure to prevent South African tax residents from utilising foreign companies in the avoidance of South African tax.

What is a Controlled Foreign Company?

A CFC is broadly defined in section 9D of the Income Tax Act, No. 58 of 1962, as any foreign company where more than 50% of the total participation rights or voting rights are directly or indirectly held or exercisable by one or more South African tax residents.

Where this threshold is met, and unless a specific exemption applies, the net income of the CFC must be included in the income of the South African resident(s) in proportion to their participation rights, and taxed accordingly.

Taxpayers who fail to accurately account for a CFC’s income risk audit or reassessment by SARS, especially in light of increased global transparency and data sharing through mechanisms such as the Common Reporting Standard.

Key Features of the CFC Regime

  • Deemed Income Inclusion: The net income of a CFC is deemed to accrue to South African resident shareholders.
  • High Tax Exemption: A CFC’s income may be exempt from inclusion if it is subject to tax in a foreign jurisdiction at a rate of at least 67,5% of the South African tax that would have been payable, had the CFC been a resident of South Africa.
  • Foreign Business Establishment (FBE) Exemption: Income earned through a “foreign business establishment” may be exempt where the CFC carries on substantial economic activity in its foreign jurisdiction. This is a factual enquiry and subject to rigorous scrutiny by SARS.
  • Passive Income Rules: Passive income (such as interest, royalties, rental, and certain capital gains) is more likely to be caught by the CFC rules, particularly where there is no meaningful economic substance abroad.
  • Anti-Avoidance and Transfer Pricing: The CFC rules operate alongside other anti-avoidance provisions, including transfer pricing rules and the general anti-avoidance rules, ensuring that offshore structures with little commercial rationale may still be taxed in South Africa.
×
Scroll to top